In "Altered Values: searching for a new collecting" found in the volume
Musuems and the Future of Collecting Simon Knell states that objects are "not good" at retaining information (30). He suggests instead that libraries and archives offer more accessible resources about the past. Knell specifically questions the importance of collecting ephemera like functional objects, positing that they are significant only because of the meaning we place upon them in this moment. For this reason, collecting is always contemporary collecting.
Is it possible that objects can hold information, but simply not the kind we find in the archive? Might they give us access to a different kind of knowing?
How might our practices of collecting better negotiate the kind of knowledge that objects offer?